Supreme Court of Arkansas September 25, 1995, CR 95-884 (King v. State)

Also known as

United States · · · 25-09-1995

Per Curiam.

Jimmy L. King moves for a rule on the clerk to file the record in his appeal. In the circumstances presented, we treat the motion as one for a belated appeal. The record has been refused because the notice of appeal was not filed in a timely manner. It was more than 30 days after a new trial motion was deemed denied pursuant to Ark. R. App. P. 4(c).

Mr. King’s counsel Thomas A.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.