Court of Appeals of Maryland February 10, 1995, Misc. (Subtitle BV), No. 48 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kent)

RAKER, Judge.

In this disciplinary proceeding, the Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, charged the respondent, Michael Gayhart Kent, with violations of Rule 1.7 (Conflict of Interest: General Rule), Rule 3.3 (Candor Toward the Tribunal), Rule 3.4 (Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel), Rule 4.2 (Communication with Person Represented by Counsel), and Rule 8.