Supreme Court of Pennsylvania August 21, 1996 (Zerbe v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review)
Also known as
United States · · · 21-08-1996
*408
OPINION
CASTILLE, Justice.
The issue before this Court is whether an employee who occupies a position which is designated as a major nontenured policymaking position or advisory position is eligible for unemployment compensation after dismissal.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit