Washington Supreme Court August 29, 1996, No. 60389-8 (State v. Lively)

Also known as

United States · · · 29-08-1996

lead-opinion

Madsen, J. —

At issue in this case is whether: (1) the trial court erred in instructing the jury as to the burden of proof for the defense of entrapment; (2) the evidence supports a finding, as a matter of law, that the Defendant was entrapped; and (3) the actions of the State constitute outrageous conduct in violation of the Defendant’s right to due process.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.