Ohio Supreme Court February 14, 1996, No. 95-444 (Westlake Medical Investors, L.P. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision)

Also known as

United States · · · 14-02-1996

Per Curiam.

Medical Investors principally argues that the BTA should have deducted amounts for the nonrealty items of the state-issued certificate of need, goodwill, and tangible personal property. We disagree.

A taxpayer has the duty to prove his right to a reduction in value. Zindle v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Revision (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 202, 203, 542 N.E.2d 650, 651.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.