Ohio Supreme Court February 28, 1996, No. 95-2529 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin)

Also known as

United States · · · 28-02-1996

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.