Ohio Supreme Court February 28, 1996, No. 95-2130 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Frease)

Also known as

United States · · · 28-02-1996

Per Curiam.

After reviewing the record, we agree with the board. We adopt its findings of fact and conclusions of law and indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio. Furthermore, as a condition for reinstatement, respondent must make full restitution to his clients with interest according to the judgment rate. We tax costs to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.