Ohio Supreme Court March 6, 1996, No. 95-42 (State v. Wogenstahl)

Also known as

United States · · · 06-03-1996

Douglas, J.

Appellant advances thirty-three propositions of law for our consideration. (See Appendix, infra.) We have carefully considered each of appellant’s propositions of law and have reviewed the death sentence for appropriateness and proportionality. Upon review, and for the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and uphold the sentence of death.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.