Ohio Supreme Court August 21, 1996, No. 96-777 (Mootispaw v. Eckstein)
Also known as
United States · · · 21-08-1996
Per Curiam.
In his sole proposition of law, Mootispaw asserts that the court of appeals erred in granting Eckstein’s motion for summary judgment and denying the writ because prosecutors are required to investigate fraud and collusion in criminal convictions.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit