District Court of Appeal of Florida February 2, 1996, No. 94-03725 (A.D.W. v. State)

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges her convictions for grand theft and burglary. We affirm appellant’s burglary conviction because we conclude that there was sufficient evidence that she was aiding and abetting. However, we reverse appellant’s grand theft conviction for insufficient evidence of value, and reduce the conviction to petty theft.