District Court of Appeal of Florida January 19, 1996, Nos. 95-1169, 95-1170 (M.C.D. v. State)
Also known as
United States · · · 19-01-1996
PER CURIAM.
In each of the above cases, we find that there was not reasonable suspicion which would justify searching appellant. See In the Interest of A.J.M., 617 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). The orders of adjudication and commitment are reversed, and the cases are remanded to the trial court to enter orders granting the motions to suppress.
WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concurring.
LAWRENCE, J.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit