Connecticut Appellate Court March 5, 1996, 14741 (Lemoine v. McCann)

LANDAU, J.,

dissenting. The majority concludes that the defendant falls within the protection of the doctrine of sovereign immunity because the trial court properly found that the plaintiffs complaint fails to allege sufficient acts of wanton, reckless or malicious misconduct. Because my review of the complaint leads me to conclude otherwise, I respectfully dissent.