Utah Supreme Court August 8, 1997, 960118 (Carrier v. Pro-Tech Restoration)

Also known as

United States · · · 08-08-1997

ON CERTIORARI TO THE UTAH COURT OF APPEARS

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

Defendant Pro-Tech Restoration (“Pro-Tech”) seeks review of the court of appeals’ decision ordering a new trial because the trial court had incorrectly determined that Pro-Tech and defendant William Smith had sufficiently disparate interests to warrant separate allocations of peremptory challenges under rule 47 of the Utah Rules

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.