District Court, C.D. California April 24, 1997, CV 96-6959 RAP (BQRx) (Doe v. Unocal Corp.)

*883

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT UNOCAL’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, FAILURE TO JOIN A PARTY UNDER RULE 19, AND FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED

PAEZ, District Judge.

I.

Introduction

Doe plaintiffs, farmers from the Tenasserim region of Burma, bring this class action against defendants Unocal Corp.