Supreme Court of Iowa March 26, 1997, 95-2074 (Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Recker)
Also known as
United States · · · 26-03-1997
LAVORATO, Justice.
In this declaratory judgment action, the district court ruled that an insured was not entitled to underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits under an automobile policy because he had breached the policy’s “consent-to-settlement” clause. We affirm.
I.
Background Facts.
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company issued a family car policy to Dale and Judy Recker.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit