District Court of Appeal of Florida January 22, 1997, No. 95-02624 (Sikorski v. State)

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Sikorski challenges his adjudication for direct criminal contempt. He contends, and the state agrees, that the trial court did not follow the procedural requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. The trial court failed to provide a written judgment of guilt reciting the facts upon which the adjudication of guilt is based as required by rule 3.830. See Spivey v.