District of Columbia Court of Appeals October 22, 1998, 98-BG-281 (In Re Shelnutt)

PER CURIAM:

The crux of this matter involves respondent’s neglectful representation of a client incarcerated in the District of Columbia.

1

Respondent is charged with the following violations: Rule 1.1(b), failure to serve client with commensurate skill and care; Rule 1.3(e), failure to act with reasonable promptness in representing a client; and Rule 1.