Court of Appeals of Wisconsin July 1, 1998, 97-3486-CR (State v. Neave)
Also known as
United States · · · 01-07-1998
NETTESHEIM, J.
The issue in this case is whether the cost of the State Crime Laboratory's analysis of a controlled substance may be imposed as a condition of probation. Because § 973.06(1), Stats.,
*788
does not recognize such expenditure as an allowable taxable cost, we reverse the trial court's postconviction order which rejected Xavier R. Neave's challenge to the condition of probation.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit