Supreme Court of Pennsylvania April 2, 1998, 193 M.D. Appeal Dkt. 1996 (Marino v. Hackman)
Also known as
United States · · · 02-04-1998
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
We must determine whether non-docket activity may be considered when deciding whether a case should be terminated for inactivity pursuant to local rules implementing Rule of Judicial Administration 1901.
1
For the reasons set forth herein, we hold that non-docket activity may be considered.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit