Ohio Supreme Court June 17, 1998, No. 98-38 (State ex rel. Adkins v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority)
Also known as
United States · · · 17-06-1998
Per Curiam.
Adkins asserts in his various propositions of law that the court of appeals erred in denying the writ. For the following reasons, however, we find Adkins’s contentions to be meritless.
First, Adkins was not entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel his release from prison on parole.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit