District Court of Appeal of Florida June 26, 1998, No. 98-658 (R.H. v. State)

PER CURIAM.

There was evidence from which the trier of fact could conclude that appellant was guilty of burglarizing a vehicle which at the time was occupied, according to appellant’s own testimony, by a person unknown to the appellant. Therefore a conviction for burglary of an occupied conveyance, pursuant to section 810.02(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1997) was appropriate.

AFFIRMED.

W.