District Court of Appeal of Florida July 2, 1999, No. 98-1627 (Miller v. State)
Also known as
United States · · · 02-07-1999
HARRIS, J.
We affirm the trial court’s handling of the Williams Rule evidence. Further, we do not agree that the court’s departure after considering a PSI insisted on by Miller was vindictive even though, before ordering the PSI, the court indicated that it intended a guideline sentence. Defendant was never promised a guideline sentence in exchange for anything.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit