Fairfax County Circuit Court July 29, 1999, Case No. (Chancery) 120450 (Tyson v. Tyson)

By Judge Michael P. McWeeny

Child Support

Mr. Lyden’s analysis of Mr. Tyson’s income is a logical extension of the limited documents in his possession; however, the result is speculative. Likewise, Mr. Moss’ presentation is based upon the statement, “Defendant believes that he will not be working any additional shifts this year.