Court of Appeals of Minnesota May 9, 2000, C5-99-1688 (Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. JAG INVESTMENTS, INC.)

OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY

*

, Judge

Appellants challenge the district court’s denial of their motion to dismiss, arguing that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over them in this mechanic’s lien action, due to improper service of process. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Defendant Jagodzinski Development Corporation (JDC) and appellant JAG Investments, Inc.