District Court, S.D. New York January 11, 2000, 98 Civ. 1691(MGC) (Poddar v. State Bank of India)

OPINION

CEDARBAUM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs sue for breach of the terms of bonds purchased from defendant State Bank of India (“SBI”). SBI moves to dismiss the complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens. For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Shrikumar Poddar, Mayurika Poddar, Vaishnava Center for Enlightenment, Inc. and India Foundation, Inc.