Ohio Supreme Court March 29, 2000, No. 99-2266 (Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Sinclair)

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. As admitted by respondent, his solicitation letter to the Shures violated DR 2-101(E)(1)(c).

In determining the appropriate sanction, we consider not only the duty violated, but also the lawyer’s mental state, the injury caused, and the existence of aggravating or mitigating circumstances. Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v.