Court of Appeals of Oregon August 30, 2000, 9400127D; CA A105248 (In re the Marriage of Van Winkle)
Also known as
United States · · · 30-08-2000
EDMONDS, P. J.
Husband appeals from a judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage, contending that the trial court erred in several respects. One of husband’s contentions is that the trial court erred in failing to rule on his pretrial discovery motion. Although we ordinarily conduct a de novo review of the record in dissolution matters under ORS 19.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit