Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit October 6, 2000, 99-3948 (United States v. Abdullah Shabazz, Also Known as Daniel Clincy)

PER CURIAM.

Abdullah Shabazz seeks review of the sentence of supervised release imposed after he was found to have violated his parole. Because Mr. Shabazz already has completed that portion of the supervised release period that was to be served in a community corrections facility, we cannot address the legality of such a condition on his supervised release.