District Court of Appeal of Florida October 6, 2000, No. 1D00-2659 (Hall v. State)
Also known as
United States · · · 06-10-2000
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the denial of appellant’s 3.850 motion. Appellant’s oath suffers from the same deficiencies identified in Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985).
BARFIELD, C.J., ERVIN and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit