District Court of Appeal of Florida December 29, 2000, No. 2D00-2010 (N.C. v. State)

PER CURIAM.

N.C. challenges a restitution order. N.C. argues that the trial court erred in entering the order because he was not present at the restitution hearing and because the court failed to make a finding as to his present ability to pay. We agree and remand for another restitution hearing. On remand, the child must be present in person or by telephone, or the State must demonstrate that N.