Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit November 20, 2000, 99-11250, 99-11259 (United States v. Jones)

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part:

I write to express disagreement with the two basic premises of the majority opinion: that there was no reasonable articulable suspicion after the dispatcher completed the computer checks on Jones and Daniel, and that Daniel’s consent to the search of the trunk of the car was invalid.