Supreme Court of Pennsylvania April 17, 2000, 0174 Middle District Appeal Docket 1996 and 0025 Western District Appeal Docket 1997 (Commonwealth v. Wimbush)

CASTILLE, Justice,

dissenting.

As the majority acknowledges, stop-and-frisk cases in this Commonwealth are evaluated under the federal standard set forth in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d *387889 (1968).1 Thus, I must respectfully dissent.2 The corroboration of the anonymous tips in both of these cases was clearly sufficient under Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 110 S.Ct.