Court of Appeals of Minnesota December 18, 2001, C6-01-664 (Pratt Investment Co. v. Kennedy)

DANIEL F. FOLEY,

*

Judge.

In this boundary dispute, appellant challenges the referee’s refusal to rule that it

*848

had acquired land via practical location of boundaries by acquiescence. Appellant alleges that the referee (1) misapplied the law by confusing the doctrine of practical location of boundaries by acquiescence with adverse possession, and (2) ignored evidence of acquiescence.