Court of Appeals of Minnesota October 2, 2001, C5-01-803 (State v. Gilbert)
Also known as
United States · · · 02-10-2001
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
At a probation-revocation hearing, the district court ordered appellant to serve a previously imposed but partially stayed sentence consecutively to a later-executed sentence from another county. Appellant argues that the district court erred by imposing its sentence consecutive to a later-imposed sentence from another county because doing so violates Minn.Stat.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit