Court of Appeals of Oregon June 6, 2001, 991400; A109294 (State v. May)

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, assigning error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress.1 The state implicitly concedes that the officers who arrested defendant on two outstanding warrants did not have grounds to search a closed, opaque candy bag that they found on defendant’s person at the time of the arrest.