Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit June 27, 2001, No. 00-30285; D.C. No. CR-00-05181-JET (United States v. Cross)

MEMORANDUM *

Because Cross did not fully confess responsibility for her offense, the district court did not commit clear error when it determined that Cross was not entitled to a sentence adjustment for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. Nor did the court err by failing to *789state the reasons underlying the sentence as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c).