Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit September 19, 2001, No. 00-10247; D.C. No. CR 94-00347-TEH (United States v. Craft)

MEMORANDUM **

David Earl Craft appeals pro se the district court’s judgment denying his motion pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) (“Rule 41(e)”) for the return of property seized by the United States following his conviction for conspiracy to import cocaine. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s denial of a motion for return of property, United States v.