Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit August 8, 2001, No. 00-3903 (Jack v. Randall)
Also known as
United States · · · 08-08-2001
Pro se Ohio prisoner Bradley Jack appeals a district court judgment that dismissed his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The case has been referred to this panel pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. We unanimously agree that oral argument is not needed. Fed. RApp. P. 34(a).
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit