District Court of Appeal of Florida August 10, 2001, No. 5D00-3530 (Pearson v. Pearson)

PLEUS, J.

We affirm the six-page final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We write only to address the husband’s argument that the order requiring him to pay 75% of the children’s uncovered medical, dental and ocular expenses be limited by the terms *1265“reasonable and necessary.” It is implicit in the court’s judgment that the expenses be reasonable and necessary. Patterson v. Cuervo, 683 So.