District Court of Appeal of Florida September 19, 2001, No. 3D01-23 (D.L.F. v. State)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the evidentiary ruling challenged on appeal. “It is axiomatic that failure to proffer what the excluded evidence would have revealed precludes appellate consideration of the alleged error.” A. McD. v. State, 422 So.2d 336, 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Mosley v. State, 616 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).