Connecticut Appellate Court July 24, 2001, AC 19910 (State v. James)

Opinion

O’CONNELL, J.

The genesis of this case was the prosecution of the defendant on five drug charges.1 The trial court granted the defendant’s motion to suppress his voluntary statement and evidence of a shipping receipt, which decision led to a dismissal of the charges. Pursuant to General Statutes § 54-96,2 the state requested permission to appeal, which the court denied.