District of Columbia Court of Appeals February 22, 2001, 96-CF-737, 99-CO-44 (Malede v. United States)

Also known as

United States · · · 22-02-2001

*274GLICKMAN, Associate Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent. I think that the trial court was obligated to hold a hearing on appellant Malede’s § 23-110 motion. A hearing was necessary under D.C.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.