Supreme Court of Pennsylvania June 19, 2002, 675 MDA 1999 and 683 MDA 1999 (Pantuso Motors, Inc. v. Corestates Bank)

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

The question presented is whether a two, four or six year statute of limitations attaches to claims for damages resulting from a judgment creditor’s failure to mark a judgment satis

*604

fíed of record after it has been paid in full and an appropriate request for satisfaction has been made.

In 1990, CoreStates Bank (“CoreStates”)

1

extended to Pantuso Motors, Inc.