Superior Court of Pennsylvania March 15, 2002 (Commonwealth v. Druce)
Also known as
United States · · · 15-03-2002
BECK, J.:
¶ 1 In this case we decide whether a sentencing judge’s comments to the press were sufficient to constitute an appearance of impropriety and so warrant the judge’s recusal from the matter. In addition, we consider whether the sentencing court abused its discretion in fashioning appellant’s punishment.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Appellant is Thomas W.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit