Court of Appeals of Minnesota April 30, 2002, C0-01-1714 (State v. Staloch)
Also known as
United States · · · 30-04-2002
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
*
In challenging a district court order revoking probation, appellant argues that the orally pronounced sentence, which suspended much of his imposed jail term and did not mention probation or conditions of
*330
probation, did not actually place him on probation and, therefore, he could not be found in violation of probation.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit