Missouri Court of Appeals November 26, 2002, No. ED 79863 (State v. Hurst)

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Danyle Hurst (“Hurst”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of one count of unlawful use of a weapon. Hurst claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the state failed to prove every element of the offense of unlawful use of a weapon beyond a reasonable doubt.