Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York August 12, 2002 (DeLuca v. Ding Ju Liu)
Also known as
United States · · · 12-08-2002
Contrary to the respondent’s contention, the appellants’ argument that the Supreme Court erroneously allowed her chiropractic expert to testify about her magnetic resonance imaging (hereinafter MRI) and electromyography (hereinafter EMG) reports was properly preserved for appellate review (see CPLR 5501).
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit