Nassau County District Court January 15, 2002 (Doe v. Roe)
Also known as
United States · · · 15-01-2002
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kenneth L. Gartner, J.
In the instant case, the defendant attorney does not dispute that he charged and collected from the plaintiff client a fee prohibited by the New York State Labor Law. The defendant attorney does not dispute that he has been ordered to make restitution by the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board (the Board).
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit