Massachusetts Appeals Court November 21, 2002, No. 01-P-396 (Commonwealth v. Rushin)
Also known as
United States · · · 21-11-2002
Kantrowitz, J.
Paring the case to its core, we are left with the following: during a hearing on a motion to suppress, was the Commonwealth required to introduce a certified copy of the city ordinance that the defendant allegedly had violated, and which provided the basis for his arrest and the seizure of evidence?
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit