Ohio Supreme Court December 18, 2002, No. 2002-1131 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Washington)

Also known as

United States · · · 18-12-2002

Per Curiam.

*484{¶ 1} This case requires us to decide the sanction for an attorney who neglected the interests of two clients, failed to return the unearned fees those clients paid, misrepresented to one of the clients the work she had done in his case, and failed to cooperate in the investigation of that misconduct.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.